
[ TEACHING METHOD AS CAPITAL IN INFORMATION 
EXCHANGE ACTIVITIES] 
 
http://devotion.greenvest.co.id |Muhammad Rivaldy Hermawan 
 
Vol. 3, No. 8, June, 2022 
Therefore, some methods of teaching and learning activities that are deemed appropriate and 
effective may be applied in the actual learning process. 
To do that, we must develop other methods that are suitable and complement each other 
between methods. It can be concluded that each learning method applied can be said to be 
good if it meets the requirements such as, in accordance with the learning objectives that have 
been designed, can be applied according to the ability of the teacher, depending also on the 
ability of the students, the suitability of the number and size of the group, according to the 
time allocation in each learning object, paying attention to existing supporting facilities. 
Herlambang (2018) argues that basically a teacher is a leader, facilitator and motivator 
for students in developing quality and making students according to their nature to be human. 
Therefore, in an effort to meet these requirements, teachers must be introduced to various 
learning methods. Next, just choose what method is suitable for use and in accordance with 
the abilities of students, with the hope that students can get maximum results in the teaching 
and learning process.  
 
REFERENCES 
 
Adler, Alfred. (2013). Understanding human nature (Psychology revivals). Routledge. 
Bada, Steve Olusegun, & Olusegun, Steve. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A 
paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 
66–70. 
Bonk, Curtis Jay, & King, Kira S. (2012). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and 
sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In Electronic 
collaborators (pp. 61–86). Routledge. 
Buckley, Patrick, & Doyle, Elaine. (2017). Individualising gamification: An investigation of 
the impact of learning styles and personality traits on the efficacy of gamification using 
a prediction market. Computers & Education, 106, 43–55. 
Darling-Hammond, Linda. (2015). The flat world and education: How America’s 
commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press. 
Dhawan, Shivangi. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. 
Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. 
González‐Marcos, Ana, Alba‐Elías, Fernando, & Ordieres‐Meré, Joaquín. (2016). An 
analytical method for measuring competence in project management. British Journal of 
Educational Technology, 47(6), 1324–1339. 
Lepper, Mark R., & Malone, Thomas W. (2021). Intrinsic motivation and instructional 
effectiveness in computer-based education. In Aptitude, learning, and instruction (pp. 
255–286). Routledge. 
Mansir, Firman, & Karim, Abdul. (2020). Islamic education learning approaches in shaping 
students’ emotional intelligence in the digital age. Hayula: Indonesian Journal of 
Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies, 4(1), 67–86. 
Mosely, Genevieve, Wright, Natalie, & Wrigley, Cara. (2018). Facilitating design thinking: A